< ^ >
9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h
.com
.wtc7.net
Home
Misinformation
red flags
daring flight routes
towering infernos
collapsing skyscrapers
miles-wide crash
paper highway
crash-proof passport
flunky super pilots
resurrected hijackers
1000 missing bodies
vanishing jetliner
carousing jihadists
"fatty" bin Laden
official alibis
George W. Bush
Donald Rumsfeld
Richard Myers
Dick Cheney
collapse explanations
experts on parade
Bazant & Zhou
Eagar
notable retractions
Van Romero
Peter Jennings
articles
JEM
Scientific American
JOM
NOVA
collapse theories
progressive collapse
core meltdown
column failure
truss failure
shockwave
piledriver
the 9/11 script
New York Times
Search
Essays
Reviews
Talks
Interviews
FAQs
Materials
Papers
Resources
Site Guide
About
Contact
Contribute
V 1.43
Copyright 2003-2015,
911Research.WTC7.net site last updated:09/09/2015
fair use notice

Background Attack Aftermath Evidence Misinformation Analysis Memorial

The Column Failure Theory

Recurrent Theory of the Twin Tower Collapses

Suggestions of the column failure theory were apparent on the day of the attack, amidst the more frequent allusions to the core meltdown theory. Just two days later it was given the support of a technical paper, Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?-Simple Analysis, written by Zdenek P. Bazant and Yong Zhou.

Although Bazant and Zhou describe their analysis as simplified and approximate, they express complete confidence that "The structural resistance is found to be an order of magnitude less than necessary for survival," and that the towers were "doomed" when the majority of columns of a single floor "lost their load carrying capacity". Simplified and approximate (and prompt) as it was, it seems to be the only published paper that purports to analyze the collapses quantitatively. Has no one else bothered to do a quantitative analysis of the greatest and most deadly structural failure in recorded history because Bazant and Zhou's simplified and approximate analysis is nonetheless comprehensively edifying and logically unassailable? Consider this review of their paper.

Analysis of the theory in light of the actual conditions show its assumptions to be unsupportable. It was soon overshadowed by the truss failure theory. By 2005, however, the column failure theory was restored to preeminence by an endorsement by NIST.


page last modified: 2009-09-11