Letters: June 1

9/11 gov't complicity

Re: 9/11: an 'inside job?'

Thank you for covering the vital fact that architects such as Richard Gage and other qualified professionals are blowing the whistle on the U.S. government's conspiracy theory of 9/11. It is crucial that the rotten foundation of the War of Terror be exposed -- and its war-criminal perpetrators arrested and tried for treason -- before the next false-flag attack on U.S. citizens, or an attack on Iran. The Democrats in Congress obviously have no intention of rocking the globalist boat with any impeachment for illegal acts that are not even in dispute, much less are they going to help expose 9/11 truth. Responsible citizens must continue to raise public awareness and keep the pressure on until a serious investigation free of conflicts of interest is started.

While I applaud your decision to cover the story, your belittling introduction ("Conspiracy buffs are in for a big treat") is unprofessional. Gage and other 9/11 skeptics know what they are talking about. It is no treat for us to have to acknowledge that government officials charged with protecting us actually killed 3,000 of us on 9/11. For many, even considering this possibility is akin to considering that your spouse or parent is a sexual abuser. This is part of the reason that the corporate and left media ignored the massive evidence of official complicity as long as possible, then treated skeptics with ridicule rather than considering the facts dispassionately. In future articles, please find the courage and strength to face the truth rationally and avoid emotional appeals designed to squelch thought.

Gregg Roberts

Austin, Texas

If we really wanted to "squelch thought," we wouldn't be running your letter.

(Obvious truth)

Re: 9/11: an 'inside job?'

My sincerest congratulations for having the strength of conviction to publish this article on 9/11.

For the past year I have been aware that 9/11 was an inside job but have seen very little mention of it in the mainstream media. This has caused me to view the mainstream media as largely irrelevant to any effort to understand global political events.

Your article has given me hope that at least some organs of the media are prepared to come forward and present the glaringly obvious truth of 9/11.

The editors of your paper all deserve commendations for running that story. Certainly you have my unreserved admiration.

Daniels Forrest

Australia

(You make us blush.)

What do you believe?

Re: Deconstructing the myth, Letters, May 29.

It was with great amusement that I read a letter writer's version of events pertaining to 9/11. The two towers which collapsed first did not collapse on top on Building 7. The towers collapsed straight down, while Building 7 stood approximately 350 feet away (about the length of a football field).

The only attempt by the main stream media to "debunk" the 9/11 truth movement has indeed been Popular Mechanics.

PM's attempts at debunking the truth movement have been weak at best. I suggest researching the works of Dr. David Ray Griffin whose research on 9/11 puts the "efforts" of PM to shame.

Are we really to believe that 19 Saudi hijackers with box-cutters controlled by a man in cave overtook four commercial airliners almost simultaneously and hit 75% of their intended targets? We need to ask the question "Who stood to gain?"

The U.S. government imposed the Patriot Act, started a war with a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, and have their sights set on Iran. All in the name of 9/11.

God help us all.

Andy Dreger

Winnipeg

(The truth is out there.)
Previous letter: Letters: May 31


Click to subscribe