<< PREVIOUS Dividing the skeptics NEXT >>

Attack was engineered to keep the skeptics in disarray.
Ongoing interference fans conflicts.

  • vagueness and contradictions in official story
    • large variations in timeline
    • the evidence vacuum
    • changing stories -- the story of F93
    • did flights 11 and 77 fly? (not in NTSB records)
    An ill-defined target is harder to attack.
  • complexity of attack
    • 'hijackings'
    • military-non-response
    • WTC hits
    • pentagon hit -- jetliner, followed by C130, KC-135 over DC
    • pentagon collapse
    • WTC collapses
    • B7 collapse
    Complexity creates divisive disagreements.
    People have different standards for evaluating evidence.
  • audicity and technical difficulty of attack
    People in government would never do anythign so evil
    What happened to Flight 77?
    How were the towers rigged with explosives without notice?
  • bracketing the truth
    Distractions from the truth by going not far enough and too far.
    • limited hangout
      The Saudis did it.
      limit hangouts avoid all of:
      • stand-down
      • remote control
      • Pentagon frame-up
      • building demolitions
    • unlimited hangover
      The tower collissions were faked.
      Core attack issues -- building demolitions -- are associated with crazy-sounding ideas.

page 11 Copyright 2003-2004 911research.wtc7.net
<< PREVIOUS INDEX NEXT >>