<< PREVIOUS Popular Mechanics Article NEXT >>

Article Designed to Give Illusion of Addressing Skeptics

See this point-by-point refutation of the Popular Mechanics article

NOTE: for internal use only; do not publish this URL or the images on this pages.

Cover: "DEBUNKING 9/11 LIES"

From a distance, one can read the headline 9/11 LIES. The subtitles "DEBUNKING" and "Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up To The Hard Facts" are only visible on closer inspection. Perhaps the cover is designed to appeal to a subconscious knowledge that the official story of 9/11 is a lie.

Editor's Notes: "The Lies Are Out There"

Here Meigs identifies the "growing army of conspiracy theorists" as the enemy.

Body of Article: "9/11: DEBUNKING the MYTHS"

THE PLANES

This spread begins with a bold lie: that "reams of evidence" support the official account of the hijackers.

THE WORLD TRADE CENTER

This dramatic layout makes it appear that the article addresses the charge that the Twin Towers were demolished. However, nearly all the claims the PM purports to debunk and red-herrings.

THE PENTAGON

This spread takes advantage of the long-hyped no-757-crash theory to pretend that it is embraced by all "conspiracy advocates".

FLIGHT 93

This page asks the reader to accept such incredible explanations that it suggests PM by be attempting to sew intrigue about Fligth 93 in order to detract from other issues, such as the WTC demolition.

Credits: "9/11 MYTHS DEBUNKED"

Few of the people and entities listed here are mentioned in the ariticle. Most of those are cited to debunk red-herring claims. Only 2 of PM's experts are cited to refute valud claims.
page 6 Copyright 2003-2004 911research.wtc7.net
<< PREVIOUS INDEX NEXT >>