<< PREVIOUS High-Profile Attacks NEXT >>

Conspiracy-Theory Bashing Goes Mainstream in 2004

  • May 26: Democracy Now
    The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks
    • Chip Berlet zeroes in on errors in Meyssan, Holmgren analysis of Pentagon attack.
    • Goodman dismisses WTC demolition because Griffin can't cite structural engineer.
  • September 13: The Nation magazine
    Executive Secrecy: Conspiracy or Failure?
    • Accuses Griffin of "recycl[ing] some of the wilder conspiracy theories".
    • First on list: "that the Pentagon was hit by a missile rather than by American Airlines Flight 77."
  • October 7: The Washington Post
    Conspiracy Theories Flourish on the Internet
    • Describes Pentagon Strike and its popularization in detail.
    • Implies that "something other than a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon" is the only challenge to the official story.
  • November 8: The New York Times
    A Hidden Story Behind Sept. 11? One Man's Ad Campaign Says So
    • Second sentence: "no plane flew into the Pentagon"
    • Mention of Building 7 contextualized by proximity to Pentagon claim.
  • November 10: Air America
    Interview with David Von Kleist, producer of In Plane Site
    • promotes Pentagon no-757-crash theory and South Tower pod-plane.

page 5 Copyright 2003-2004 911research.wtc7.net
<< PREVIOUS INDEX NEXT >>