Counterpunch
September 9/10 , 2006
How They Let the Guilty Parties of 9/11 Slip Off the Hook
The 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts
By ALEXANDER COCKBURN
You trip over one fundamental idiocy of the 9/11 conspiracy nuts --
-- the ones who say Bush and Cheney
masterminded the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon --
in the first paragraph of the opening page of the book by one
of their high priests, David Ray Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor.
"In many respects", Griffin writes,
"the strongest evidence provided by critics of the official account
involves the events of 9/11 itself, In light of standard procedures
for dealing with hijacked airplanes -- not one of these planes
should have reached its target, let alone all three of them."
The operative word here is "should".
One characteristic of the nuts is that they have a devout,
albeit preposterous belief in American efficiency,
thus many of them start with the racist premise that
"Arabs in caves" weren't capable of the mission.
They believe that military systems work the way Pentagon press
flacks and aerospace salesmen say they should work.
...
|
|